„Wikipédia:Feltételezz jóindulatot!” változatai közötti eltérés

==A jóhiszeműségről==

Everyone makes mistakes, both behavioral (like [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]]) and content-based (like adding [[WP:NOR|original research]]), and we can correct them with reminders most of the time. However, there will be disagreements on Wikipedia for which no policy or guideline has an easy answer. When disagreements happen, it may not be that someone has ill intent. Keep a [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|cool head]], and consider [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] if disagreements seem intractable; many of them are not.

 

This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of contrary evidence. Assuming good faith does not prohibit discussion and criticism, but instead editors should not attribute the actions being criticized to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice.

 

Violation of some policies, such as engaging in [[WP:SOCK|sock-puppetry]], violating [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]], and so on, may be perpetrated in either good or bad faith. There are processes for dealing with all of these, and [[WP:BLOCK|sanctions]] for repeated violation of policy apply regardless of whether bad faith was involved.

 

===A jóhiszeműség és az újoncok===

{{fő|Wikipédia:Ne harapd le a kezdők fejét!}}

It is important to be patient with newcomers, who will be unfamiliar with Wikipedia's culture and rules, but may nonetheless turn out to be valuable contributors.

 

A newcomer's behavior probably seems appropriate to him/her, and a problem in that regard usually indicates unawareness or misunderstanding of Wikipedian culture. It is not uncommon for a newcomer to believe that an unfamiliar policy should be changed to match their notion of how things should function, especially if they notice that there is already some level of disagreement over the policy in question. Similarly, many newcomers want to have their contributions to articles accepted without question, especially which pertain to subjects on which they have extensive knowledge. Behaviors arising from these perspectives, while perhaps misguided, are usually not malicious and should not be treated as such. Many new users who lack an intuitive grasp of Wikipedia customs are gradually brought around once the logic behind them becomes more clear.

 

===A jóhiszeműség és a szerzői jog===

 

When dealing with possible copyright violations, good faith means assuming that editors ''intend'' to comply with site policy and the law. That is different from assuming they have actually complied with either. Editors have a proactive obligation to document image uploads, etc. and material may be deleted if the documentation is incorrect or inadequate. Good faith corrective action includes informing editors of problems and helping them improve their practices.

 

==Mutasd be a saját jóhiszeműséged==

 

In addition to assuming good faith, encourage others to assume good faith by demonstrating your own good faith. You can do this by articulating your [[Wikipedia:Honesty|honest]] motives and by making edits that show your willingness to compromise, interest in improving Wikipedia, adherence to policies and guidelines, belief in the veracity of your edits, avoidance of [[Wikipedia:Gaming the system|gaming the system]], and other good-faith behavior. Showing good faith is not required, but it aids smooth and successful interactions with editors.

 

==A rosszindulat kezelése==

Even if bad faith is evident, do not act [[Wikipedia:Civility|uncivilly]] yourself in return, [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] others, or [[Wikipedia:Wikistress|lose your cool]] over it. It is ultimately much easier for others to [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|resolve a dispute]] and see who is breaching policies, if one side is clearly acting appropriately throughout.

 

Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] and other experienced editors involved in dispute resolution will usually be glad to help, and are very capable of identifying policy-breaching conduct if their attention is drawn to clear and specific evidence.

 

===Másokat vádolni rosszindulattal===

Making accusations of bad faith can be [[Wikipedia:Edit war|inflammatory]] and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]] if bad faith motives are alleged without clear evidence that the others' action is actually in bad faith and [[WP:Harassment|harassment]] if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of bad faith on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle.

 

== Lásd még ==

 

{{Irányelvek és útmutatók}}

 

[[Kategória:Viselkedéssel kapcsolatos irányelvek, útmutatók]]