„Királyok völgye 60” változatai közötti eltérés

[ellenőrzött változat][ellenőrzött változat]
Tartalom törölve Tartalom hozzáadva
Új oldal, tartalma: „{{Egyiptomi sír infobox |név = Királyok völgye 60 |tulajdonos = Szitré In |kép = |képaláírás = |elhelyezkedés = …”
Címke: HTML-sortörés
 
Nincs szerkesztési összefoglaló
19. sor:
|szöveg pozíciója =left
}}
A '''Királyok völgye 60''' (KV60) egy [[Ókori Egyiptom|egyiptomi]] sír a [[Királyok völgye]] keleti völgyének egy délnyugatidélkeleti [[vádi]]jában. 1903-ban fedezték fel.
 
==Felfedezése és feltárása==
A sírt [[Howard Carter]] fedezte fel 1903-ban. Már az ókorban kifosztották, de a két múmiát (ideiglenes nevükön KV60A és KV60B) és némi megrongálódott temetkezési kelléket még találtak itt a régészek. Carter nem sok munkát végzett a síron, 1906-ban [[Edward R. Ayrton]] folytatta munkáját. Ayrton a [[kairó]]i [[Egyiptomi Múzeum]]ba vitte a KV60B múmiát koporsójával együtt. Az elhunytat a koporsó feliratai alapján azonosították [[Szitré (dajka)|Szitrével]] (becenevén: ''In'' vagy ''Inet''), a [[XVIII. dinasztia]] idején élt [[Hatsepszut]] fáraónő dajkájával. A sírról sem Carter, sem Ayrton nem készített rajzokat vagy térképeket, és holléte feledésbe merült.
 
1990-ben egy [[Donald P. Ryan]] és Mark Papworth vezetése alatt dolgozó csapat újra felfedezte és feltárta a sírt.<!-- A még mindig itt található KV60A múmiát megvizsgálták,
 
In 1990 the tomb was rediscovered, reopened and properly excavated by a team led by [[Donald P. Ryan]] and Mark Papworth. This produced evidence both in favour of, and casting doubt on, Thomas's theory. On the supporting side, the mummy proved to be that of a relatively elderly lady, with her left arm flexed in the pose thought to mark a royal mummy. On the other hand, none of the pottery fragments recovered during the excavation could be dated to any time earlier than the [[20th Dynasty]]. Most interestingly, a wooden face-piece from a coffin possibly destined for a male (it seemingly had a place to fit a false beard) was found – but the tomb contained only females, and Hatshepsut is known to have used the false beard. The mummy was placed in a new wooden coffin, and left in the tomb, which was resealed.
-->
==Források==
* Nicholas Reeves – Richard H. Wilkinson: ''The Complete Valley of the Kings'' (Thames & Hudson, 1996) pp.&nbsp;186–187.
46 ⟶ 53 sor:
 
<!--
dueA to the uncertainty over the identity of one female [[mummy]] found there (KV60A), thoughtmúmiáról by sometöbben, such as the noted [[Egyptologist]]köztük [[Elizabeth Thomas (Egyptologist)|Elizabeth Thomas]] is, tofeltételezték, behogy thatmagának ofHatsepszutnak [[18tha dynasty]] [[Pharaoh]] [[Hatshepsut]].teste,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/06/27/scimum127.xml|title=How I found Queen Hatshepsut|work=Daily Telegraph|accessdate=2007-06-30 | location=London | first=Roger | last=Highfield | date=27 June 2007}} {{Deadés link|date=Octoberhogy 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref>a Thistrónon identificationőt has recently been advocated bykövető mostohafia, [[EgyptologistIII. Thotmesz]] [[Zahitemettette Hawass]].itt <refújra, name=Hawass>{{citeeltávolítva web|url=http://wwweredeti sírjából.guardians.net/hawass/hatshepsut/search_for_hatshepsut.htm|title=Search for(Az Hatshepsut}}</ref>akkoriban elterjedt, ma már meghaladott elmélet szerint ez része volt Thotmesz bosszújának trónbitorlónak tartott mostohaanyja ellen.)
This identification has recently been advocated by [[Egyptologist]] [[Zahi Hawass]]. <ref name=Hawass>{{cite web|url=http://www.guardians.net/hawass/hatshepsut/search_for_hatshepsut.htm|title=Search for Hatshepsut}}</ref>
 
When the tomb was discovered by [[Howard Carter (archaeologist)|Howard Carter]] in 1903, it was found to have been ransacked and desecrated in [[Ancient Egypt|antiquity]], but still held two mummies, along with some badly damaged grave goods; Carter apparently did little work in the tomb.
 
In 1906 [[Edward R. Ayrton]] reopened it, and removed one mummy, KV60B, together with the coffin it was in, to the [[Egyptian Museum]]. The coffin was inscribed with the name and title ''royal nurse, In''. This personage has been widely identified with ''[[Sitre In|Sit-Ra]],'' called ''In'', who was the royal nurse of Hatshepsut. Since neither Carter nor Ayrton drew plans or maps indicating the location of the tomb, the whereabouts of the tomb became forgotten.
 
[[File:Hatshepsut-CollosalGraniteSphinx02 MetropolitanMuseum.png|thumb|Large granite [[sphinx]] bearing the likeness of the female pharaoh [[Hatshepsut]], who in June 2007 was proven to be one of the occupants of KV60([[Metropolitan Museum of Art]]).]]
Thomas later (in 1966) speculated that the second (unidentified) mummy was that of Hatshepsut, relocated there (to the tomb of her nurse) by [[Thutmose III]], as part of his campaign of official hostility towards her.
 
In 1990 the tomb was rediscovered, reopened and properly excavated by a team led by [[Donald P. Ryan]] and Mark Papworth. This produced evidence both in favour of, and casting doubt on, Thomas's theory. On the supporting side, the mummy proved to be that of a relatively elderly lady, with her left arm flexed in the pose thought to mark a royal mummy. On the other hand, none of the pottery fragments recovered during the excavation could be dated to any time earlier than the [[20th Dynasty]]. Most interestingly, a wooden face-piece from a coffin possibly destined for a male (it seemingly had a place to fit a false beard) was found – but the tomb contained only females, and Hatshepsut is known to have used the false beard. The mummy was placed in a new wooden coffin, and left in the tomb, which was resealed.
 
In early 2007, the tomb was reopened and the second mummy, KV60A, removed for testing. On 27 June 2007, [[Supreme Council of Antiquities]] director [[Zahi Hawass]] offered what he considered to be definitive proof that this "corpulent, elderly" body was indeed Hatshepsut. <ref name=Hawass />