„Wikipédia-vita:Válaszeszköz” változatai közötti eltérés
Tartalom törölve Tartalom hozzáadva
→Usefulness: later |
→Usefulness: Válasz |
||
34. sor:
:{{reply to|Whatamidoing (WMF)}} I like this feature and I think it would be good for newcomers as well. One minor bug I <em>almost</em> reported several times, but never actually, is that it <em>sometimes</em> conflicts with wikEdDiff (“Fejlettebb lapváltozat-összehasonlító” in [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets]]), which is used by 76 active users, in addition to the 47 active users using wikEd itself. Can you look into it? Thanks in advance, —[[Szerkesztő:Tacsipacsi|Tacsipacsi]] <sup>[[Szerkesztővita:Tacsipacsi|vita]]</sup> 2020. július 20., 22:37 (CEST)
::[[Szerkesztő:Tacsipacsi|Tacsipacsi]], please tell me more about this. How do you trigger the bug? [[Szerkesztő:Whatamidoing (WMF)|Whatamidoing (WMF)]] <sup>[[Szerkesztővita:Whatamidoing (WMF)|vita]]</sup> 2020. július 21., 03:01 (CEST)
:::{{reply to|Whatamidoing (WMF)}} Just by clicking the usual [reply] button, if I’m unlucky. If I’m lucky, it works with the very same URL. wikEdDiff’s distinctive feature is (in addition to its own diff engine) that it turns the <nowiki>[[]] and {{}}</nowiki> codes in the normal MediaWiki diff into links. (I use wikEdDiff only, never the “large” wikEd, but I assume the same goes for both.) My best guess is that things go wrong when wikEdDiff loads faster than DT, so when DT parses the page, it finds well-formed signatures—including user page links and timestamps—in the diff view as well, not only in the actual page content, and gets confused by the same signature appearing twice; the [reply] link only works with the first occurrance (i.e. in the diff), clicking the second (the one in the actual page content) results in a warning message <blockquote>Could not find the comment you're replying to on the page. It might have been deleted or moved to another page. Please reload the page and try again.</blockquote> [[Szerkesztő:Tacsipacsi|Tacsipacsi]] <sup>[[Szerkesztővita:Tacsipacsi|vita]]</sup> 2020. július 22., 00:25 (CEST)
:{{reply to|Whatamidoing (WMF)}} thank you! I will make a quick poll asking other editors about your question. (Accidently, I answered you with clicking the edit link instead of the reply link. We need some time become used to the new tool :)) [[User:Samat|Samat]] <sup>[[User vita:Samat|üzenetrögzítő]]</sup> 2020. július 20., 22:58 (CEST)
:[https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia:Kocsmafal_(javaslatok)&diff=prev&oldid=22880202&diffmode=source Quick poll]. The statistics are interesting, but I have the feeling, that the thresholds are too low. It shows, that there are about 50 editors on the Hungarian Wikipedia, who is interested in new beta features, and about 35 editors tried it at least twice (or with other words second time after the first one). I understand that the team would like to show higher percentages of the usage, but it would give a more realistic picture if we could see how many editors (for the beta phase, later how many percentage of the active editors) use it (for example) more than 50% on the discussion pages or how many editors opt out after tried it. It makes probably more sense to check these numbers after it will be the default tool and more editor use it. [[User:Samat|Samat]] <sup>[[User vita:Samat|üzenetrögzítő]]</sup> 2020. július 21., 22:58 (CEST)
| |||